Single clinical laboratory test can rapidly detect serious infections
Reviewed by Emily Henderson, B.Sc.Nov 11 2020
UC San Francisco scientists have developed a single clinical laboratory test capable of zeroing in on the microbial miscreant afflicting patients hospitalized with serious infections in as little as six hour.
Irrespective of what body fluid is sampled, the type or species of infectious agent, or whether physicians start out with any clue as to what the culprit may be.
The test will be a lifesaver, speeding appropriate drug treatment for the seriously ill, and should transform the way infectious diseases are diagnosed, said the authors of the study, published November 9, 2020 in Nature Medicine.
The advance here is that we can detect any infection from any body fluid, without special handling or processing for each distinct body fluid. It's a simple procedure."
Charles Chiu, MD, PhD, Study Corresponding Author and Professor, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California – San Francisco
Chiu is also a director of the UCSF-Abbott Viral Diagnostics and Discovery Center.
Conventional diagnostic tests are designed to detect only one or sometimes a small panel of potential pathogens. In contrast, the new protocol employs powerful "next-generation" DNA-sequencing technology to account for all DNA in a sample, which may be from any species — human, bacterial, viral, parasitic, or fungal.
Clinicians do not need to have a suspect in mind. To identify a match, the new test relies on specially developed analytical software to compare DNA sequences in the sample to massive genomic databases covering all known pathogens.
Chiu and colleagues at the UCSF Center for Next-Gen Precision Diagnostics first developed this method to identify infectious agents in spinal fluid in cases of encephalitis and meningitis, notably helping to save a long-sick boy's life, and later validating the protocol for use as a clinical test that is now being ordered by physicians at hospitals nationwide.
Chiu and collaborators also developed a similar blood test for sepsis, a leading killer of hospital patients, while other tests use respiratory fluid to diagnose infectious causes of pneumonia.
- Study shows brilacidin strongly inhibits SARS-CoV-2 in laboratory cell lines
- Improved diet and more physical activity during pregnancy modifies infants’ DNA
- 3D structural model of BAF complex modifies DNA architecture, provides clues on cancer
But each of these tests is designed to work only with specific body fluids, not all. Unfortunately, physicians are often uncertain of the origin of a patient's infection and must send off samples of several different body fluids simultaneously for lab analysis.
In the new study, the UCSF researchers, including Center for Next-Gen Precision Diagnostics co-founders Joe DeRisi, PhD, and Steve Miller, MD, PhD, compared performance of their new single-protocol "metagenomic" DNA test to gold-standard laboratory culture-based tests and now-standard PCR-based DNA tests, using two high-powered DNA sequencing technologies to diagnose bacterial or fungal infection.
One was a portable, pocket-sized sequencer made by Oxford Nanopore Technologies, which can complete sequencing within six hours and to date has been used almost exclusively by research labs.
The other was Illumina sequencing, which can simultaneously handle many samples in parallel and which already is used in some clinical labs (including at UCSF), but which requires more than 24 hours to complete.
The researchers analyzed body fluids — 180 samples from in and around the lungs, the peritoneal cavity, pus-filled abscesses, the spinal cord, joints, and other sites such as tonsillar fluid and even vitreal (eye) fluid– from 160 patients, 144 of whom were hospitalized.
Compared with gold-standard culture and PCR, the researchers diagnosed 79% of bacterial and 91% of fungal infections by Illumina sequencing, and 75% of bacterial and 91% of fungal infections by nanopore sequencing.
Using the metagenomic DNA test, Chiu and colleagues were also able to diagnose infections in seven of 12 patients whose illnesses had remained undiagnosed after standard culturing or PCR-based DNA testing.
"We think this one metagenomic test can potentially replace all PCR-based DNA tests now being used to detect hundreds of organisms that can't be adequately cultured," Chiu said.
The researchers are now moving towards FDA regulatory approval in hopes of making this test a standard part of clinical practice at UCSF and elsewhere.